How Much Does Makeup Cost To Make

Information technology Costs $ii.50 to Brand Lipstick — Here's Why You're Charged So Much More than

This is not a matter of "yous get what y'all pay for."

By May 30, 2018, eight:00am EDT

Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to Voice.com, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vocalism. You can also run into what we're upwardly to past signing upwards hither.

The beauty industry is not at all transparent about how information technology sets prices on products. It's known, vaguely, that margins and markups are high, but most shoppers probably don't know how a lipstick gets from a mood board to your local Sephora. And why do some cost $8 while others cost $50?

It's a question that brands never speak nearly on the record, and the secretive attitude is prevalent all the way downward the supply concatenation. Some manufacturers and ingredient suppliers even crave beauty companies they work with to sign a nondisclosure agreement, according to manufacture sources.

And so-called radical transparency has been a large buzzword in mode as more brands face scrutiny nearly sustainability and labor bug. It's a concept that is simply starting to hit dazzler, especially as consumers are demanding more "clean" products and information about ingredients. One of the near visible companies peddling transparency, at least as it relates to pricing, is Beauty Pie, which sells makeup and pare care at price afterwards members pay a monthly fee. Information technology was founded by Marcia Kilgore, the serial entrepreneur who launched Bliss in the '90s. The site lists the bodily cost breakup of each production, in three full general categories: product/packaging, warehousing, and safety/testing.

Julie Fredrickson, the CEO and co-founder of Stowaway Cosmetics, is a big fan of Beauty Pie. Fredrickson launched Stowaway in 2015 with makeup creative person Chelsa Crowley, who is no longer with the company. The visitor has grown 30 percent month-over-month since launch. (A chip of early on way net trivia: Fredrickson was besides the founder of Coutorture, a network of fashion and dazzler blogs sold to PopSugar in 2007.)

All of Stowaway'southward products are shrunken versions of makeup basics in archetype shades. "I wanted to solve my ain trouble, which is: How practice I go an unabridged routine locked up in a teeny little bag to take with me?" Fredrickson says, as well noting that she thinks not many women actually finish a whole total-size lipstick. She categorizes information technology every bit a premium brand based on its ingredients and performance.

Fredrickson offered to open up Stowaway's books to Racked and speak frankly well-nigh what information technology costs her to brand products. Every bit of the procedure is an expense: the lipstick tube, the decoration, the product itself, filling the production, the outer box, and putting information technology in a box to ship information technology to customers. "Dazzler is the merely industry in which I take plant that the aphorism 'you get what you lot pay for' isn't true, and that really bothers me," Fredrickson says.

Exposing a bit of the underbelly of the industry in which she makes money is a risk for her and her business, though plainly it could do good Stowaway if customers perceive this as a genuine goodwill gesture. (More than on this concept presently.) Regardless, she came with literal receipts likewise every bit lab samples and promotional materials from suppliers touting the major name brands they work with.

How much does information technology price to start a makeup company?

"If yous're doing it with less than 2 one thousand thousand bucks, skillful luck," Fredrickson says. Stowaway raised $1.5 million at launch from a group of investors, and then this is something she knows about. "I was like, 'That's a shit-ton of money!' Only the amount we spent just on product when nosotros first launched was $250,000." (For comparison, Glossier raised $two 1000000 at commencement, then another $8.iv one thousand thousand a year after. Information technology has afterward raised an additional $76 million. Fredrickson won't disclose any subsequent rounds of funding Stowaway has had.)

Then accept into business relationship creating and maintaining a website, warehousing, marketing, and operational costs, and it'south easy to see how you lot can accident through startup money. All of this is also eventually factored into the final retail price of products.

Retail versus directly to consumer

Stowaway sells mostly direct to consumers via its site, but information technology sells kits in Bluemercury and has done one for J. Crew. The determination to wholesale to retailers tin be fraught for small brands, as illustrated past the recent Sephora and Obsessive Compulsive Cosmetics lawsuit. In general, when a retailer wants to sell a company's products, the retailer buys those products from brands at 50 to 65 percent less than the retail toll, and so marks them support to sell, taking that turn a profit.

That means the brand needs to sell a lot more than to make a profit, which explains why makeup prices can sometimes exist x times higher in a store than what they cost to brand. Both the shop and the brand needs to see a turn a profit. Selling products to retailers means giving up a lot of potential income and command; the upside is that you lot can brand that up in book too equally become incredible exposure. Of form, if a brand chooses to stay directly to consumer, that comes with its own costs, like paying more staff and maintaining a website. Shipping and handling can likewise exist a big financial hit. It all contributes to the final price you the shopper pay.

One production can come from three dissimilar countries

To sympathize where the money goes, follow where the production goes. Generally, the formula comes from a different supplier than the palettes, tubes, and packaging. Formulas, once they're fabricated in bulk, are ofttimes filled at an entirely unlike location. This is the norm, unless it's a company that'due south vertically integrated like ColourPop or Deciem, meaning information technology owns and manages most of its supply chain. Very few beauty brands are set up similar this.

Stowaway's components come from China and its pigments come from Italy. While many products are filled in Italia, a few are filled in the Usa. All of this travel for a single product ways increased costs and logistical nightmares. Lipsticks in item have to be air-shipped rather than shipped on a ... ship, considering of temperature variance, according to Fredrickson. An bounding main crossing tin can result in a gob of melted wax. "I actually care a lot about Trump'south tariffs. That is a very real problem for me," Fredrickson says.

Lipsticks in a makeup manufacturing facility.

Frederickson is looking into sourcing formulas from Korea, which has a booming cosmetics manufacture. Stowaway can and so manufacture and fill in the same place, which is more than price-effective in the long term, not to mention that it'due south quicker to become the lipstick tubes from Red china to Korea. "The Italians, for all of their flaws when it comes to speed, really understand color, but the Koreans are much faster on the chemistry," she says. "And remember that quote that Netflix gave: 'We take to become HBO faster than HBO becomes us'? That's happening in cosmetics, and America is like a afar 10th on the list of places yous would source from."

Lipstick packaging is expensive

Fredrickson says lipstick is 1 of the most expensive products to manufacture. For Stowaway, it costs about $two.48 to make its miniature version, though she says that can vary past about 20 cents in either direction.

Prices are not static and tin modify from batch to batch. She used to charge $12 for one simply has since dropped the cost to $ix. For comparing, a standard-size lipstick at Beauty Pie is listed equally $3.13 to $iv.45 depending on formula and colour, which would exist a retail equivalent of $25. Paint can be expensive, with lipstick formulas costing about $1 per unit of measurement; Fredrickson says browns are "super cheap." Paint toll can vary between colors by as much as 50 cents per unit.

"Goop in a bottle is cheap," Fredrickson says, mainly considering there is less labor involved. A lipstick requires more elaborate machinery and a "hot pour" via an expensive mold. Stowaway had to brand a custom mold for its lipsticks because of the size.

The real cost is in the packaging, though. Brands pay for the lipstick base and caps separately; even the little sticker on the bottom with the color proper noun is a dissever toll. They range from 30 to 60 cents for each tube half. Decoration with logos and other design increases the cost. Stowaway adds a matte, rubbery coating called Soft Bear on, which is the same every bit what's on Nars's packaging. Fredrickson chose it considering it looks and feels more luxe, merely information technology can increase the price of a cap by ten cents or more. A consummate tube can price from 60 cents to more than $i, depending on the handling and how many a company orders.

The lowest order quantity is usually ten,000 units at a fourth dimension. If a brand tin order 100,000 at a crack, the price goes down significantly. Fredrickson notes that large companies lodge in the millions, and costs are therefore significantly less. "Sometimes the components are so expensive that nosotros can't afford to keep as many on hand as we would like," she says.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel to make dupes

In the beauty industry, finding dupes, or products that closely mimic popular yet expensive favorites, is a cottage industry. Fredrickson does not shy away from proverb openly that she sometimes seeks to dupe things. For the brand'southward new Burnt Rose lipstick, for example, she wanted it to exist the same color as Charlotte Tilbury's uber-popular Pillow Talk, which retails for $34. On Stowaway'due south site, there'southward even a header for each product that reads "What It'south Like," and compares it to its name brand equivalents.

"It'southward actually really easy [to gull], and this is why nobody patents annihilation, because then you take to reveal the exact proportions of ingredients," Fredrickson says. She'south right.

"Information technology is really a unproblematic matter for a corrective chemist to outset from an existing formula and recreate something that works just as well," writes cosmetic chemist Perry Romanowski. "If y'all have a patent, it's an even easier chore...Making something that does not violate the patent just works just as well is piece of cake. ... Consumers are non skillful at discerning subtle differences betwixt like formulas." Oof.

Half the size doesn't mean half the cost to produce

Smaller products, which is what Stowaway makes, don't necessarily cost proportionally less than their standard-size counterparts to brand, according to Fredrickson. For example, Stowaway's two.seven-gram pulverisation blush costs $3.98 to make; Dazzler Pie'south three.5g version costs $3.43. So all those minis yous're tempted to buy at the checkout lines at Ulta and Sephora are not necessarily assisting for those brands; they're hoping you lot'll get hooked and buy the larger version.

"Sometimes minis are even more expensive to make, every bit they require more than precision [to tool]. And then when a retailer takes 65 percent of your retail cost and you have almost the same costs of appurtenances to industry a smaller size as a larger size, you are often losing money if yous sell it at retail," Fredrickson says.

The bottom line about the beauty industry's bottom line

Giving customers a peek into what it costs to make a lipstick is one thing. But the $17 billion question hither (that's how much the Usa prestige dazzler manufacture sold in 2017) is: How do the prices consumers pay bound by 10 times or more? There are a lot more intangibles that become into pricing besides but deciding to sell through retailers or non.

"Cosmetics are marked up and so much because conglomerates aren't just in the 'sell you great makeup' concern. [Some of these] companies are in the lifestyle and brand business concern, and because cosmetics are so cheap to make, they use the opportunity to make 90% turn a profit on the makeup they sell you in lodge to subsidize the rest of their business concern," says Fredrickson. "Your lipstick is paying for everything from really expensive brand campaigns, to unprofitable designer clothes, to the profits for the retailer that sells the makeup to you."

In an unusual motion for a beauty company, Stowaway has added cost breakdowns for all of its products to its website. Its eyeliner costs 95 cents to make. The eyeshadow palette costs $4.08. Concealer in a tube is $ii.44.

The brand has likewise also just dropped its retail prices on everything by several dollars. Fredrickson denies ever having received complaints virtually the erstwhile pricing, though brands, most recently Bliss, will make big price corrections if the market calls for it. Stowaway dropped prices, "because we can," says Fredrickson, noting that "consumers are used to paying [higher] prices." (Recently, an commodity in Beauty Independent for new dazzler entrepreneurs advises them to "trend high on the price.")

Stowaway'due south increased transparency and lower prices have and so far garnered positive feedback from customers. The contemptuous take would be that this is a savvy marketing tactic in a time of false news, fake product reviews, and influencers peddling products for big bucks that they don't disembalm. Only the brand might also be shooting itself in the pes with this strategy by perchance alienating retailers and decreasing its own profit margins. People also respond emotionally to brands and branding, which is why they're often happy to spend for products that speak to them.

Fredrickson is sanguine well-nigh the risks. "When it comes downwardly to information technology, I'm a backer and I'yard trying to become you lot a slap-up product."